<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Vs Microsoft on Yahoo Accusation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ideas2o.com/web/google-vs-microsoft-on-yahoo-accusation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ideas2o.com/web/google-vs-microsoft-on-yahoo-accusation</link>
	<description>web2.o, internet, voip, news</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yahoo&#8217;s Main Page after Microsoft Accusation &#124; ideas2o</title>
		<link>http://www.ideas2o.com/web/google-vs-microsoft-on-yahoo-accusation/comment-page-1#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahoo&#8217;s Main Page after Microsoft Accusation &#124; ideas2o</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideas2o.com/web/google-vs-microsoft-on-yahoo-accusation#comment-30</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Vs Microsoft on Yahoo Accusation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Vs Microsoft on Yahoo Accusation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayB</title>
		<link>http://www.ideas2o.com/web/google-vs-microsoft-on-yahoo-accusation/comment-page-1#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>SayB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 08:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideas2o.com/web/google-vs-microsoft-on-yahoo-accusation#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Well, BOOOO for Microsoft. Yahoo is Yahoo, and it should stay like that. That being said, have they ever wondered WHY more than 80% of the people use Google for searching the internet? ... duhhh ... may be because the result relevancy is really good and they don't try to PUSH-SELL you sponsored links and rather only UP-SELL ? ... try searching for a term via MS and they'd try to sell you the sponsored links first that have NOTHING to do with relevancy and would end up ANNOYING you. Also, if I'm using a slow internet connection then I can't even THINK about searching via Microsoft. Yahoo is better. What Microsoft SHOULD do is get a bit more innovative and invest in developing their own ideas to sell. Heck, the only product that I like is their .NET framework and Server edition of windows because they DO give some good stuff there. They SHOULD come out of the BOX now :P ... Hehehe, think "Stewie" from Family Guy. The attitude reminds you of him. CHEERS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, BOOOO for Microsoft. Yahoo is Yahoo, and it should stay like that. That being said, have they ever wondered WHY more than 80% of the people use Google for searching the internet? &#8230; duhhh &#8230; may be because the result relevancy is really good and they don&#8217;t try to PUSH-SELL you sponsored links and rather only UP-SELL ? &#8230; try searching for a term via MS and they&#8217;d try to sell you the sponsored links first that have NOTHING to do with relevancy and would end up ANNOYING you. Also, if I&#8217;m using a slow internet connection then I can&#8217;t even THINK about searching via Microsoft. Yahoo is better. What Microsoft SHOULD do is get a bit more innovative and invest in developing their own ideas to sell. Heck, the only product that I like is their .NET framework and Server edition of windows because they DO give some good stuff there. They SHOULD come out of the BOX now <img src='http://www.ideas2o.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> &#8230; Hehehe, think &#8220;Stewie&#8221; from Family Guy. The attitude reminds you of him. CHEERS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
